Legalizing any drug evokes strong emotions from people on both sides. This article is not designed to be a belief piece, but instead an effort us look at some broad issues, facts, and monetary concerns the potential legalization of pot.
In the united states, pot is currently classified as a Schedule 1 narcotic. That category indicates it has no healing use and a high abuse potential. There have been attempts over the past 2 decades to shift it into a different category, but not successful. It is obvious there is lack of a opinion as to whether it has healing properties, as 15 states as of 2011 have legalized its usage for multiple medical ailments.
Is it reasonable for the US to continue classifying pot as a result when other enslaving and malignant substances like which can be are allowed? That is a hot button topic. The web link between tobacco and various cancers is clear, yet it is big business and it does produce tax debts. There are clear labels on these products, yet over 20% of the American public smoke.
A 2002 Time journal poll showed an amazing 80% of Americans supported legalizing medical pot. In the early the twentieth Century, artists and intellectuals were frequent users of pot when it comes to enhancing creativity. By the mid 1920’s, the American media had latched about the idea that there was a connection between pot and crime, both chaotic and sexual. It is pretty clear at this point that’s not true at all, but then even without any research to back up that fallacy all states had laws by the 1930’s unsafe effects of pot usage. medie edie’s 1:1 cbd/thc – 100mg gummies
The Commissioner of Narcotics at the time, Harry Anslinger, crusaded against pot in front of congress, the medical establishment, and the media warning against its dangers to society. As a result, in 1937, congressional hearings ensued with the result being the Pot Tax Act of 1937. This did not make pot illegal, but created a hefty tax structure around every the main pot cycle (cultivation, distribution, sale). The burdensome nature of the Act pushed pot usage to a negligible status.
Finally in the 1940’s research began quit showing pot to be relatively harmless compared to hard drugs like cocaine and heroin. The association with physical violence became negated and understood to be most likely from the alcohol being consumed in conjunction with pot. However, with the legal structure placed around pot the general public saw it as dangerous despite an escalating body of research showing it to be relatively (not completely) harmless.
During the fifties and sixties pot use increased, but research mostly focused on LSD and other hard drugs. By 1970, the National Institute of Mental Health reported that 20 million Americans had used pot at least one time. In 1970, a Gallup poll showed that 42% of university students had smoked cigarettes pot.
As more and more research ensures that pot does not contribute to chaotic behavior, it seems only natural that people would feel they have been humiliated to by the government agencies who are in control of interpreting these issues. Pot has to be obtained illegally for healing usage in 35 states to this day, and patients have to live in anxiety about federal justice. Should pot law and policy be re-considered? Should it simply be re-considered for healing usage or for overall usage and grow sold next to tobacco, matches, and alcohol?
In the 1970’s, there was a push to de-criminalize small amounts of pot. For those supporting decriminalization, the view was that the laws against pot were more harmful than the drug itself. Us president Jimmy Peterson in 1977 requested the decriminalization of small amounts, so did the American Medical Association and American Bar Association. It didn’t happen.
The 1980’s saw a reverse of these efforts, and with Us president Reagan the War on Drugs ensued with tougher policies and penalties on almost every drug. Pot usage was lost during this decade while alcohol, cocaine, and crack skyrocketed. The 1990’s saw a change of usage trends. Between 1992 and 1994, pot usage doubled in adolescents.
Pot is not harmless. The cannabis plant has over 400 chemicals in it, and there’s a lot we don’t know about it. Should it be illegal though? Should it be a Schedule 1 Narcotic? It is a big cash harvest and unsafe effects of it could bring in significant tax debts along with eliminating the need to provide resources for so much justice. Many medical and scientific professionals have produced evidence about marijuana’s healing benefits, and 15 states have allowed for its usage for debilitating conditions.
A current study showed pot can have long lasting effects on teenagers mind, and it can impact coordination and mental capacity while under its effects. Which means this needs to be assessed in the pros versus cons debate. The “illegal” label promotes a significant negative feel in people’s minds, and the robust discussing has shown no proof of letting up.